Berkeley Engineering

Fall 2002

Contents


From the Dean

Features

>

Women in engineering: An eye on the numbers

>
>

Giving cancer the cold shoulder

> Fire aboard spacecraft: the devil's in the atmosphere

Spot News

Student Spotlight

Faculty Stories

Alumni Wrap

College Support



Go to Spring 2002

Download
Spring 2002 PDF

Download
Fall 2001 PDF

Download free
Acrobat Reader for PDFs


 

Fire aboard spacecraft:
The devil's in the atmosphere

By Susan Davis


Back in 1997, a faulty oxygen supply unit caused such a dangerous fire aboard the Mir space station that the six-man crew had to don gas masks and prepare for an emergency escape. While there have been no fatalities from fires aboard a spacecraft recently, some researchers predict that there’s an extremely high probability of a severe, even tragic fire occurring on a spaceship. The odds, they say, are particularly high for spacecraft on long missions, such as the 10-to 20-year missions anticipated for NASA’s International Space Station, or a manned mission to Mars.

Fire is an extremely dangerous and very real possibility aboard the International Space Station. Several incidents of overheated and charred cables and electrical components have already occurred on the Space Shuttle, the craft used to transport equipment and personnel to the space station.

In a spacecraft’s small cabin, a fire could rapidly use up all available oxygen, while flames, smoke, and smoldering could destroy the computers and navigational equipment. What’s more, without gravity – and the buoyancy it causes – smoke doesn’t rise to activate a smoke detector’s alarm; nor are fire extinguishers particularly effective because the weightless atmosphere just scatters the foam about.

NASA has long been concerned about the dire consequences of fire aboard a spacecraft. But until recently, the agency has operated under the assumption that, since fresh air plays a greater role in flammability on earth than in space (because an air current will fan, not suppress a fire), materials that are not flammable on earth would be the same in space. Based on that assumption, the agency has only analyzed flammability of the materials used for spacecraft interiors in earth’s atmosphere, where the conditions that affect flammability can be remarkably different than those in space.

Five years ago, NASA called on Carlos Fernandez-Pello, Berkeley professor of mechanical engineering and director of the NASA-funded Microgravity Combustion Laboratory, to develop a methodology for testing the flammability of the materials used aboard spacecraft and, for the first time, to perform those tests under zero gravity conditions. What Fernandez-Pello found defines a new set of parameters for fire safety in space. "After conducting the first tests in zero gravity, we were all surprised to find out that materials ignite more easily and burn faster in spacecraft than in earth’s gravity," says Fernandez-Pello.

A variety of factors influence how fire behaves in space. Because there is no gravity, the fire does not induce buoyant air currents. "If you think of a fire in earth’s normal gravity conditions," Fernandez-Pello says, "you can see that the buoyancy-induced air has two roles." First, he explains, it cools the burning material by drawing in colder air, which tends to suppress the fire. Conversely, the cooler air brings fresh oxygen, fanning the fire. "Our job is to find out if conditions in space would favor the cooling factor or the fresh oxygen factor, because that’s what determines flammability."

Riding the notorious "Vomit Comet," where Fernandez-Pello and his research team have a 30-second window to run their flammability experiments, requires efficiency,
pluck, and a strong stomach.

The first step was to look for ways to replicate zero gravity’s conditions in earth’s atmosphere, a feat they could accomplish with an extraordinary aircraft called the KC-135, a plane able to follow a parabolic flight pattern at an altitude of 30,000 feet. At the peak of each of its roller coaster-like parabolas, zero gravity is momentarily achieved inside the craft. Affectionately known as the "Vomit Comet" for obvious reasons, the KC-135 doubled as a film set, providing Apollo 13 film director Ron Howard with authentic weightless scenes for actor Tom Hanks and his crew.

When used as a laboratory, researchers aboard the KC-135 strap their feet to stay put, and try to keep a calm stomach. "We do 10 parabolas in a row and then the plane levels out, and then another 10, for a total of 40 in a day," Fernandez-Pello says, "That’s where the airplane got its name and it’s why they give us little plastic bags." As the aircraft descends from the parabola and gravity kicks in again, passengers usually hit the floor with a bang. "You get used to it," Fernandez-Pello says with his trademark grin. "It’s actually a fantastic experience."

Beyond those visceral challenges is another: that the data must be collected at just the right moment in the parabolic loop to take advantage of zero gravity. "For no more than 20 or 30 seconds, we have a chance to measure the flammability of materials as if we were in space," Fernandez-Pello says. To that end, the team used a new testing device developed in Fernandez-Pello’s lab, called the Forced Ignition and Spread Test (FIST), a small wind tunnel equipped with an external radiant heat flux, or very intense flame.

Materials mimicking those aboard a spacecraft are placed inside the wind tunnel and exposed to both the radiant heat and the kind of air currents present in a spacecraft, allowing researchers to calculate just how quickly each one ignites. Fernandez-Pello’s team is now testing acrylic plastics, blended poly-propylene with fiberglass composites, as well as the laminated epoxy glass often used in circuit boards. They have been surprised to learn that many of the materials used in today’s state-of-the-art spacecraft actually ignite as much as 50 percent faster in zero gravity conditions than on earth. "It turns out that the cooling effect of air currents is much more important on earth than we realized," Fernandez-Pello says.

This revelation is crucial because a fire in space is much more likely to occur than our current sci-fi visions of space travel would have us believe. Spacecraft contain abundant combustible materials, from paper, clothing, and plastics to circuit boards and electrical cables.

"Spacecraft designers must have accurate information so they know which materials to use where," Fernandez-Pello says. "We can’t build spacecraft out of steel, right? So we really do have to know which materials are flammable and which are not."


Author Susan Davis, whose father helped design the Apollo fuel cells, is a Bay Area writer and editor. Davis has written on environmental issues for Intel Corporation, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and The Nature Conservancy. She co-authored The Sporting Life, a book on the physics of sports, and is currently working on a book about the natural history of rabbits.


FOREFRONT reports on activities in the College of Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. It features developments of interest to the engineering and scientific communities and to alumni and friends of the College.

Published three times a year by the Engineering Public Affairs Office. Have a comment about Forefront? E-mail your letter to the editor. Click here to learn more about the magazine.


© UC Regents    Feedback