Berkeley Engineering


WINTER 2005



Contents


Dean's Message

Letters

In the News

>

UCB chancellor named to stem cell committee

>
>

US lead in supercomputers in jeopardy

> $42.6 million grant by Gates Foundation for malaria drug
> Engineers take lead ASUC role
>

NEES' pioneering earthquake engineering

>
>

James O'Brien named to TR100

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Features

>

Heading into the golden age of wireless 2.0

>
> Temple of Zeus rises from 4th century BC Greece

The Gift of Giving

>

Berkeley, not baseball, has been very good to him

>

Barbara Newell chats with graduate fellows

Alumni Update

>

Steven Chu lectures at Cal Homecoming weekend

>
>

EECS alum teaching computers to speak K'iche'

> A computer scientist with a bird's-eye view
> Alumnus Maurer heads Seabees in Iraq conflict
>
>

CEE alum hits home run on third career choice



Class Notes


Download PDF


Archives


Fall 2004

Spring 2004

Fall 2003

Spring 2003

Fall 2002

Spring 2002

 




Temple of Zeus rises again
Column reconstruction reveals an obsession with engineering perfection that dates back to 4th century B.C. Greece

by Jenn Shreve

Temple and moon
Ancient Nemea was one of four 'crown' game sites in the early Panhellenic Games, precursor to the Olympics. This site was named for wild celery, the victory prize out of which winners’ crowns were woven.
STEPHEN MILLER PHOTO, Courtesy Nemea Excavations Archive, UC Berkeley

At the site of Ancient Nemea in the Greek province of Corinthia, where mythology records Hercules’ first labor with the ferocious Nemean lion, life goes on much as it has for the last two millennia. Here, in the seismically active eastern foothills of the Arcadian Mountains, the land is studded with olive trees and grape fields and is home to a small village of farmers. The Temple of Nemean Zeus, although mostly in ruins, still dominates the valley as it has for more than 2,300 years.

Last August, as the world’s Olympians descended upon Athens, the New Nemean Games were wrapping up 80 miles to the west. Revived in 1996 by Berkeley classics emeritus professor Stephen Miller, the games attracted more than 700 runners from around the world. They competed B.C. style—barefoot and sporting tunics. Their course was a clay track, dug out millennia ago in the shadow of the Temple of Zeus. Among the runners was Berkeley civil engineering professor and Greek native Nicos Makris.

“The games were a shower of information from how things were done in the past,” says Makris. A specialist in earthquake engineering who joined the Nemean Temple project in the fall of 2002, Makris served with Miller as codirector for one year, then took over as director last January.

Miller, who retired in December, felt his work at Nemea would not be complete until attention turned to the Temple of Zeus. “It’s this temple, which has been in ruins for centuries, which will provide links to the site’s sacred and cultural origins as well as valuable insights into ancient Greece’s innovative engineering techniques,” says Miller.

While it is standard fare for archaeologists to preserve and analyze the monuments they excavate, Miller made the decision more than 20 years ago to go beyond that at the temple, taking on the ambitious task of trying to reconstruct the temple’s columns.

“For me,” he says, “the impetus for reconstruction is preservation. Yet when it came time to literally put the pieces back together again, I had to confess there were problems with the temple I wasn’t prepared to handle because I’m not an engineer.” Miller, a classical archaeologist, began excavations in ancient Nemea 30 years ago, unearthing the town’s athletic stadium, entrance tunnel (covered in ancient graffiti with the athletes’ names), track, bathhouse, and what is likely the world’s oldest locker room. “What it has meant is that we get an interesting discussion back and forth: archeology-engineering. There’s a spirit of cooperation that Nicos and I have that’s very productive.”

Built in 330 B.C., the Temple of Nemean Zeus was an architectural and engineering triumph, combining elements of the Classic Doric temples with a creative twist of Hellenistic experimentation. Its presence had always dominated the Valley of Nemea. “The temple was the religious focal point of the Nemean Games and the one monument that every member of the crowd was sure to visit,” says Miller.

Fourth century B.C. visitors, who came by the tens of thousands every two years for the festival games—athletes, trainers, judges, lawyers, slaves, and priests—made their way through a bustling crowd of magicians, fortune-tellers, historians, poets, and peddlers to the temple’s altar to offer sacrifices and prayers to Zeus.

They approached the 9,240-square-foot temple from the east, arriving at the temple’s facade, which was elegantly formed by six 34-foot-high Doric columns. The outer colonnade of the temple consisted of 32 columns—six along the short east and west sides, and 12 along the long north and south sides. The building had an interior colonnade of 14 Corinthian-style columns and stone stairs at the back of the main chamber leading into a sunken crypt, where local oracles dealt out predictions throughout the festival games. It was in front of the stairs that the imposing statue of Zeus resided. Long gone, the cult statue was most likely taken to Argos when the games were moved there in 271 B.C., according to Miller.

Miller in archives
“We share a fundamental creativity with the ancient Greeks that marks the human spirit at its best,” says Professor Stephen Miller, working at the Nemean Archives in Dwinelle Hall.
PEG SKORPINSKI PHOTO

The temple was meticulously oriented by its ancient architects so that, at sunrise on the late July day the festival began, the sun’s rays were precisely angled to pierce directly through the open temple doors, bathing the statue of Zeus in bright light.

Over the years, the temple weathered wars and the erosion of time, but it was the persistently recurring temblors in this seismically active region—some exceeding a 7.0 magnitude—that most experts believed brought the temple down. However, in the course of his analysis, Makris learned otherwise. “It was people who brought the columns down,” he says. “They used the foundation and other square stones to build other structures, including a 5th century basilica to the south, built from the ‘borrowed’ stones.” Early Christians of that era, say Makris and Miller, threw down the 34-foot columns surrounding the temple to gain access to the square blocks inside. What this meant was that the three remaining columns possessed incredible seismic integrity, Makris says.

“This was a crucial discovery. We proved that the Greeks had state-of-the-art knowledge in engineering. This temple was designed to withstand earthquake motions much stronger than those expected in the province of Corinthia. This is the most solid proof of the brilliance of the ancients’ structural design.”

Unlike the monolithic columns of earlier Greek temples, this temple’s architects designed columns made of mounted stone cylinders, called drums. Each of the 32 outer columns and two inner columns on the entrance porch was constructed of 13 separate limestone cylinders. Measuring an average of 1.5 meters in diameter, three-quarters of a meter in height, and weighing some 2.5 tons each—massive enough, say the experts, to keep them from being looted—these huge cylinders were stacked with astonishing precision in a multidrum column typical of the era. The joints between the drums were carefully sealed and the porous limestone completely coated with a plaster made from the dust of Pentelic marble—fine white marble mined from quarries near Athens—giving the humble limestone structure the grand appearance of a marble monument.

So why then, did these ancient architects choose the awkward drums as building blocks instead of single monoliths as the Greeks had been so fond of using in earlier temples?

“I’d always been told that the Greeks in early days adopted column drums for economic reasons,” says Miller. “It was cheaper.” But as the team began replicating the precise fit of the ancient drums—26 hand-worked surfaces per column—it became clear that they were neither easier to use nor more affordable. Makris tested the stability of different column designs and found a more compelling reason for the switch to the multidrum design.

“It was seismic safety,” he says. The Greeks had a strong belief in the perfect fitting of stones, Makris explains. “They often created surfaces that would fit together within 1/32 of an inch, which is tremendously difficult to do when working with a material as porous as limestone. Despite the fact that they were building with a poor material, they managed to create a monument with amazing acuity and craftsmanship."

It was their obsession with perfection that gave the temple superior stability, says Makris. “At the same time, the temple was built in such a way that, should a strong earthquake occur, the stone blocks were not tied together with rigid connections up the center, so there was the necessary mobility, and the temple could absorb the incoming energy from the earthquake.”

This discovery, Miller realized, was supported by a key linguistic clue: The Greek word for column drum, spondylos, also means vertebra. “We’ve come to understand that the flexibility and shock-absorbing principles of the spinal column were what they were after,” says Miller.

Temple aerial view
Aerial view of the Temple of Zeus. The column drums, weighing a hefty 2.5 tons each on average, can be seen scattered around the temple. "Because its interior had been robbed of so much building material," says Makris, "fully reconstructing the Temple of Zeus may not be possible."
STEPHEN MILLER PHOTO, Courtesy Nemea Excavations Archive, UC Berkeley

The process of rebuilding is a painfully slow one, one column per year, Makris estimates. At a quarter of a million dollars per column, it’s also tremendously costly. Rebuilding each column requires restoring the stones along the foundation, the column drums, as well as the large stone beams that once ran along the tops of the columns, many of which are badly damaged.

The Greek Ministry of Culture mandates that ancient materials be preserved wherever possible and that building techniques of the past be emulated. This means that when repairing damaged stone, workers preserve the look of the original piece by making a plaster cast of the broken surface, then replicating it using a complicated system to create a negative impression of the ancient surface on the new replacement block. A cement-based adhesive that combines the dust of the new stone is mixed in so that the original physical and chemical properties of the stone are replicated as nearly as possible, allowing moisture in the stone to pass through instead of rotting the stone away at the joint, as would happen if an adhesive like epoxy were used.

“In a simple world we’d just pour concrete,” says Miller. “But since our task is to put back into place all the ancient material that has survived and reproduce the same techniques used in antiquity to the best of our ability, there is a great deal that goes into this.”

A growing archive of engineering discoveries has already emerged from the site. The team discovered that wooden pegs placed in the center between two drums were used as rivets, so the ancient Greeks could rotate one drum atop another to achieve a perfect fit. In the summer of 2003, cement was discovered below the top of the foundation.

“I always believed the Greeks used cement more frequently than we gave them credit for,” says Miller. “Porous limestone has lots of holes. In putting new blocks together [in modern construction], when we run into a block with a lot of holes, we fill it with cement. The ancient Greeks did the same thing, something we’ve recently learned.”

By the end of summer 2002, Miller and his team had successfully reconstructed two new columns, bringing the number of standing columns to a total of five. Over the next two years, Makris hopes to complete the work already under way on the next four columns to fill out the northeast corner of the temple. But one of the main obstacles the team faces on the next four columns is the need to reconstruct nearly 80 blocks missing from the foundation. In compliance with the Ministry of Culture, new material is sourced from the same ridge that the temple’s original builders mined. Several unused drums remain there to this day. Large boulders displaced from the construction of a nearby highway have also been cut into rough shape using a chainsaw fitted with a diamond piece, then hand finished to create the final surfaces.

“The ancient Greeks were not building these temples out of necessity. They built them because they wanted to express the greatness of their civilization,” says Makris, who is on sabbatical in Greece. “This is a remarkable opportunity to preserve a valued part of my country’s heritage. There’s a lot we don’t know yet. Every step in the process has yielded long-lost information about the ancient Greeks’ remarkable abilities as engineers and architects.”


JENN SHREVE is a freelance writer who covers technology and culture. She lives in San Francisco and is earning her M.F.A. in fiction writing at San Francisco State University.

SARAH YANG,
UC Berkeley Media Relations, contributed to this story.

 


FOREFRONT takes you into the labs, classrooms, and lives of professors, students, and alumni for an intimate look at the innovative research, teaching, and campus life that define the College of Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley.

Published three times a year by the Engineering Public Affairs Office. Have a comment about Forefront? E-mail your letter to the editor. Click here to learn more about the magazine.


© UC Regents    Feedback