Berkeley Engineering Home
Volume 2, Issue 9
November 2002



Outline List

In This Issue
Do You See What I See?

The Future of Oral History

A Hot Topic in Space Travel

Nanocrystals, Quantum Dots, and Nature's Own Assembly Line

Berkeley Engineering History: Jurafsky Wins a MacArthur Fellowship

Dean's Digest

Archives 2002
2001

Lab Notes, Research from the College of Engineering


Your Turn

Comments, questions, suggestions?
Send us your feedback by emailing lab-notes@coe.berkeley.edu.


Novel Nuclear Reactor (Batteries Included)

I'm not the public, but I do think we need large amounts of low-priced electricity. Nuclear would be choice if it can provide safety, and resolve the spent fuel problem. I think it is important to define the cost of electricity (FOB reactor), and would hope for $0.02 or less per KW hr.

Electricity should replace oil in transportation and buildings. PEM fuel cells seems to be the best approach. Local "gas" stations could hydrolyze water throughout the country. Since water is in short supply in much of the country, including the East Coast this year, a fuel system design should be "closed," in the sense that the vehicle collects exhaust water and returns it to the "gas" station for recycling into hydrogen & oxygen. Both should be bottled, and inserted into vehicles needing refueling.

While costs are considerably different than in the petroleum industry, a hydrogen economy has the advantage of minimizing the cost of environmental impacts. However, none of this can work unless large amounts of low-cost electricity are available.

The ENHS reactor design appears to offer a good solution for U.S. needs, and should be incorporated into a proposed system engineering approach to our energy processes. If it is indeed safer, installations could be closer to load centers (e.g., cities) than at present, thus reducing transmission costs.

I suspect that it can be buried underground for protection from terrorist action.

— Darrell Duane


I read the Novel Nuclear Reactor article and was very impressed. I think nuclear power is a more responsible form of energy then the traditional burning of fossil fuels. Hopefully this reactor will prove to be as ideal as the article mentions. Imagine...nuclear cars!

— Brian Cavagnolo


If You Can See This, You're Too Close

That is a good idea.

BMW has a project for car's red light, which burns stronger or weeker depending of the way the driver touches the break-pedal. Than the light burns very light or weaker.

By the way it would be very helpful if normal cars also could have additional flashing lights at the very top of the car to show the direction they want to go. But such lights are not welcomed by all car-disigners, therefore I think that they are not available. Anyhow Volvo station wagons have their direction flash-lights quite high on the back of their cars.

— Christian Glaser



Lab Notes is published online by the Public Affairs Office of the UC Berkeley College of Engineering. The Lab Notes mission is to illuminate groundbreaking research underway today at the College of Engineering that will dramatically change our lives tomorrow.

Editor, Director of Public Affairs: Teresa Moore
Writer, Researcher: David Pescovitz
Designer: Robyn Altman

Subscribe or send comments to the Engineering Public Affairs Office: lab-notes@coe.berkeley.edu.

© 2002 UC Regents. Updated 11/1/02.